The Department of Justice has filed for a tourist court order to compel Apple to assist it in unlock the telephone set that belong to one of the deadSan Bernardinoshooters . “ Apple is not above the law , ” it reads .

If this sounds familiar , that ’s because there is already a court ordering covering the exact same case , which was pass down before this hebdomad . Tim Cook publically challengedthe rescript , which has galvanized a discussion on security and tech companies ’ cooperation with legal philosophy enforcement .

Today ’s gesture is for a royal court order to compel Apply to follow with the initial court order . ( Ahhh , the sound summons . ) The distinction with the erstwhile order is that the new one is way surlier . “ Apple ’s current refusal to comply with the Court ’s Order , despite the technological feasibility of doing so , instead is likely based on concern for its business modeling and steel marketing strategy , ” it scan . In other word : This is just just praseodymium .

William Duplessie

https://gizmodo.com/why-you-should-care-about-apple-s-fight-with-the-fbi-1759639200

Apple’slegal reply to the initial court orderis due February 26 , and the administration is due to respond March 5 — after which Apple will have up until March 15 to answer with a brief .

The DOJ does n’t want to expect that long , and views Tim Cook ’s public response as the equivalent to the response the company would give in court . In thisnew question , the DOJ stresses the urging of the investigating :

Starship Test 9

Apple ’s public statement makes open that Apple will not comply with the Court ’s monastic order . The government does not deny Apple its right to be hear , and expect these issue to be fully briefed before the Court ; however , the urging of this probe requires this motion now that Apple has made its intentions not to comply patently clear .

In case there was any ambiguity about whether the DOJ think Apple is being irresponsible , the movement basically states that Apple designed a earpiece to mess up up law enforcement . “ Apple designed its software and that design intervene with the execution of search warrants , ” the motion reads .

The DOJ also stress that it did n’t necessarily need to file a 2d parliamentary procedure :

Lilo And Stitch 2025

DOJsays it does n’t actually take a raw court order , but if Apple wants to oppose , well , let ’s fight.pic.twitter.com/kyDruckX0B

— Brad Heath ( @bradheath)February 19 , 2016

While it is obviously true that Tim Cook ’s statement against abide by with the is fantabulous Puerto Rico for Apple , this does not make the position wrong . At any pace , the deterrent example today , in case there was any question at all , is that the DOJ means business organization .

CMF by Nothing Phone 2 Pro has an Essential Key that’s an AI button